Her bio page states that her breasts as real. They look obviously augmented to me. They have that swollen look that fake breasts tend to have. The top and bottom halves are symmetrical, whereas real breasts tend to have a tear drop asymmetric shape. And lastly, the nipples hang a bit too high for them to be real.
May I ask the basis for the 'breasts are real' data?
Disclaimer - I am not suggesting that fake breasts are superior/ inferior/ equal quality to real breasts. Just asking a data question.
Her breasts might be unnatural, but not obvious for me. IMO, it is safer to take "real" with such a case, since "fake breasts" tend to spoil model's impression. Some kind of "Presumed Innocent".
We would take "fake" by finding her small breasted figure and unnatural difference.
Comments
Her bio page states that her breasts as real. They look obviously augmented to me. They have that swollen look that fake breasts tend to have. The top and bottom halves are symmetrical, whereas real breasts tend to have a tear drop asymmetric shape. And lastly, the nipples hang a bit too high for them to be real.
May I ask the basis for the 'breasts are real' data?
Disclaimer - I am not suggesting that fake breasts are superior/ inferior/ equal quality to real breasts. Just asking a data question.
Schmoe - they look ok to me - what do others say? (:R
Her breasts might be unnatural, but not obvious for me. IMO, it is safer to take "real" with such a case, since "fake breasts" tend to spoil model's impression. Some kind of "Presumed Innocent".
We would take "fake" by finding her small breasted figure and unnatural difference.